California lawmakers’ attempts to reform prisons and other detention facilities met a mixed fate in the legislative session that ended last month, a sign that the blue state is not as progressive in its criminal justice reform agenda as many have hoped it would be.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has spent the past few weeks reviewing, signing and issuing vetoes for hundreds of bills passed by the Legislature.
A review of the state’s database for legislation shows more than 120 bills that explicitly refer to the Department of Corrections have been introduced in the 2023-2024 legislative session, with mixed success.
Among the most recent prison-related bills to successfully pass his desk is Senate Bill 474, which will significantly reduce markups on items sold in prison “canteen” stores.
Known as the “BASIC Act,” the bill from Sen. Josh Becker, D-Menlo Park, requires items sold in prison commissaries or “canteen” stores be marked up no more than 10% above the price paid to the vendor — a steep cut of current prices that are often 65% over what the vendor charges and can reach markups up to 200%.
Leslie Soble, senior manager of the Food In Prison Project at Impact Justice, an Oakland-based criminal justice reform organization, said incarcerated people rely on canteens because many prisons don’t serve enough nutritious, appealing food, leading some incarcerated people to resort to desperate measures like stealing or trading sexual favors to get enough to eat.
“The result is increased rates of food and nutrition insecurity in the mainly low-income, BIPOC communities that most incarcerated people come from and return to,” Soble said in a statement. “This is a critical and overlooked health equity issue, with clear solutions.”
Eduardo Dumbrique, who served more than two decades in state prison for a first-degree murder charge in Los Angeles County for which he was later exonerated, said even with three meals provided each day, the food he was served in prison often did not feel adequate.
“It’s not enough,” he said. “If you don’t go to the canteen, you’ll be hungry.”
Becker, in an interview last month, pointed to examples of canteen markups such as toothpaste sold for $6 that would have been less than $2 at Walmart or coffee for $9.05, and toilet paper for $1 per roll.
“These are basic necessities that have egregious markups — we’re talking toothpaste, feminine hygiene products,” Becker said, explaining that if the goal for most incarcerated people is successful reentry back into the world, inflated prices can hurt that effort. “It burdens them with debt and makes reentry harder.”
Plus, he said, inflated prices often hit their family members, who send money to them while incarcerated. In a statement Tuesday, Becker praised the governor’s signature on the bill, which follows the passage of another law he introduced last year that made phone calls free for incarcerated people.
The Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, which advocated for SB474, estimates that it will save families whose members are incarcerated upward of $16 million annually, beginning when the bill goes into effect Jan. 1.
“This is a huge win, not only for our Californians that are incarcerated but for their families who will be able to put that money into savings for their personal needs and goals,” Carlos Hernandez with the MILPA Collective, an advocacy organization comprised of those affected by the criminal justice system, said in a news release. “Also, I believe it is equally important that our government has demonstrated to historically disenfranchised communities that they are willing and capable of uplifting their values and finding all Californians worthy of human dignity.”
The governor also signed Senate Bill 309, a measure introduced by Sen. Dave Cortese, D-San Jose, that aims to ensure that people in state and local prisons or jails can keep their personal religious head coverings or other attire until they are able to buy or access similar items from the facility directly — a provision that had not been guaranteed thus far in California facilities.
Nazeehah Khan, the policy government affairs manager for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in California, said in a news release that the organization had heard from and represented many Muslim people across the state who had been denied the ability to keep their religious garments or maintain religious grooming practices.
“CAIR-CA found this problem had grown into a pattern birthed from the lack of a statewide, uniform policy and resolved to tackle the issue at its root,” Khan said in the statement. “Religious expression is not only a civil right — but an inherent, human right.”
The law also requires prisons and jails to allow people to maintain their hair or beards for religious reasons.
Other prison-related bills were less successful.
Another proposal from Cortese to allow judges to review the cases of people sentenced to life without parole if the person has been incarcerated for at least 25 years was pulled before reaching a vote in the Assembly.
The governor vetoed the “HOME” Act (Assembly Bill 1306), which would have prohibited the California Department of Corrections’ from collaborating with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. The corrections department transferred more than 1,100 people to federal immigration authorities last year, slightly more than the previous year, according to records obtained by the Chronicle.
“I believe current law strikes the right balance on limiting interaction to support community trust and cooperation between law enforcement and local communities,” Newsom wrote in his veto statement. “For this reason, I cannot sign this bill.”
A bill from Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, to increase mental health treatment in state prisons stalled in committee earlier in the year, as did Assembly Bill 428, which would establish a Department of Reentry to facilitate the process of incarcerated people transitioning back into society.
And even though a bill introduced by Assembly Member Chris Holden, D-Pasadena, to restrict the number of days people could be held in solitary confinement passed both houses of the state Legislature this past session, Holden pulled the bill before it reached a vote to send it to the governor’s desk, instead holding it over as a two-year bill that can be taken up in the 2024 legislative session.
Newsom has resisted the efforts to legislate changes to solitary confinement, which the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation calls “restricted” housing.
In his veto of a similar bill last year, Newsom ordered the department to write new regulations for its use of those forms of confinement. The department published those proposed changes earlier this month, but advocates say they fall flat.
Proponents of further reform, including formerly incarcerated people and their families, continue to urge for legislative changes that would limit solitary confinement across jails, prisons and immigration detention facilities.
“Our growing campaign, led by people who have lived through solitary or had family members inside, has continued to thwart his efforts to marginalize our movement,” said Hakim Owen, a California resident who experienced solitary confinement in the state’s prisons and is now studying at UC Berkeley and advocating for prison reform, in a statement. “The people have spoken. The vast majority of legislators have spoken. And now the governor needs to join his own party on the right side of history.”
Annie Sciacca is a freelance reporter based in Oakland.